The lens
and cataract

When the lens becomes clouded or too rigid, it is replaced with a custom-calculated intraocular lens. The choice of implant and the precision of the biometric calculation are the two levers that turn a functional surgery into a refractive one.

Cataract
surgery

A cataract is a progressive clouding of the lens — the eye's natural lens, normally transparent. It causes a decline in vision, glare, impaired contrast perception and, sometimes, a change in refraction. The only treatment is surgical.

The procedure consists of removing the clouded lens by phacoemulsification — an ultrasound probe fragmenting the lens through a 2.2 mm micro-incision — then implanting an artificial lens to replace it. The procedure is performed as a day case, under topical (eye-drop) anaesthesia, and usually lasts ten to fifteen minutes.

Visual recovery is fast: most patients regain functional vision within 24 to 48 hours. The final refractive result stabilises over a few weeks, while corneal healing completes.

Technique

Phacoemulsification

Ultrasound fragmentation. 2.2 mm incision. No sutures. Day case.

Anaesthesia

Topical, with eye drops. Sedation if needed. No general anaesthesia in the great majority of cases.

Recovery

Functional vision within 24–48 h. Refractive result stable in 3 to 6 weeks.

Video — Cataract surgery Source: Clinique Saint-Pierre Ottignies

Refractive cataract
and clear lens

Refractive cataract surgery

In standard cataract surgery, the main goal is to restore clear vision by replacing the clouded lens. Refractive cataract surgery goes further: from the planning stage it incorporates a precise optical-correction goal, aiming to reduce or remove the dependence on glasses after surgery.

This involves more demanding biometry, the choice of a precision implant (EDOF, multifocal, toric), and an in-depth discussion of the patient's visual expectations. The refractive approach is offered as a matter of course to patients who are candidates for it.

Clear-lens surgery

In some presbyopic patients — whose lens is still transparent but has lost all ability to accommodate — the same procedure can be performed in the absence of a cataract. This is known as clear-lens surgery (refractive lens exchange, RLE).

The indication is discussed case by case. It is particularly relevant in high hyperopes, or in patients whose cornea and anterior segment do not allow correction by laser or phakic implant. It permanently removes the risk of a future cataract, since the natural lens is removed.

Choosing
your implant

The choice of implant is the central refractive decision in lens surgery. It takes into account the ocular anatomy, the refractive history, the visual habits and the patient's expectations regarding independence from glasses. No implant is universally superior: each family suits a different patient profile.

01

Monofocal

A single point of focus

The monofocal implant corrects refraction for a single distance — generally distance vision. Near vision and, to a lesser extent, intermediate vision require glasses.

It is the implant that offers the best refractive predictability and the best optical quality in night vision. It is indicated in patients whose lifestyle is compatible with occasional spectacle wear, or in those for whom refractive safety takes priority over spectacle independence.

  • Most predictable refractive result
  • Maximum optical quality at distance
  • Very few halos or glare
  • Reading glasses usually needed
02

EDOF

Extended depth of focus

The EDOF implant (Extended Depth of Focus) does not create several distinct focal points: it stretches the range of sharpness from distance to intermediate vision (computer, dashboard). Near vision still requires glasses in low light, but is often satisfactory in bright light.

Night-time optical quality is better than with a multifocal, with fewer halos. Neuroadaptation is shorter and easier. It is often the best-tolerated compromise for patients wanting more independence without sacrificing night-vision quality.

  • Excellent distance and intermediate vision
  • Moderate night-time halos
  • Shorter neuroadaptation than with the multifocal
  • Occasional reading glasses possible in low light
03

Multifocal

Aims for full spectacle independence

The multifocal implant creates several focal points (distance, intermediate, near) through concentric diffractive zones. When selection is rigorous and neuroadaptation complete, the great majority of patients no longer need glasses day to day.

In return, halos and glare around night-time light sources are more frequent than with the other families. A period of neuroadaptation is needed (a few weeks to a few months). Selection requirements are stricter: maculopathy, significant glaucoma or an irregular cornea contraindicate this implant.

  • Best potential independence from glasses
  • More frequent night-time halos and glare
  • Neuroadaptation required
  • Stricter selection criteria

Toric implants

Each of these families exists in a toric version, incorporating a correction of corneal astigmatism. The toric model is selected for refractive cataract surgery when preoperative astigmatism exceeds about 0.75 to 1.00 cylindrical dioptres. Its axial alignment is calculated preoperatively and checked intraoperatively.

Calculation after
previous refractive laser

Corneal laser surgery (LASIK, transPRK, PRK) changes the curvature of the anterior cornea. Now, the standard biometric formulas used to calculate the power of a cataract implant were developed for unoperated corneas: they use corneal keratometry (the curvature measurement) to estimate the overall refractive power of the cornea, which is no longer valid after laser ablation.

After a myopic laser (which flattens the central cornea), the standard formulas overestimate the residual corneal power and lead to an underpowered implant → risk of postoperative hyperopia. After a hyperopic laser (which steepens the cornea), it is the opposite: risk of residual myopia.

Specialised formulas and dedicated calculators (Barrett True K, ASCRS Post-Refractive IOL Calculator) make it possible to correct this bias. Accuracy improves when the pre-laser data are available: initial refraction, correction performed, pre-laser keratometry.

What the surgeon needs

  • Pre-laser refraction if available
  • Correction performed (dioptres treated)
  • Technique: LASIK, transPRK, PRK
  • Approximate date of the procedure
  • Operative reports if accessible

What this means for you

In the absence of pre-laser data, the calculation is still possible but the margin of uncertainty is wider. It is important to be aware of this before surgery: the refractive result may deviate further from the intended target, and a residual correction with glasses remains possible.

Options after
radial keratotomy

Radial keratotomy (RK) is a surgical technique used from the 1970s to the 1990s, which corrected myopia with radial incisions on the cornea. It has been largely superseded by the Excimer laser, but many patients operated on at that time now approach cataract surgery with a deeply reshaped cornea.

01

Diurnal variation of vision

The radial scars have reduced rigidity. At night, lying down, the incisions open up slightly, which flattens the cornea and changes the refraction. On waking in the morning, vision can be noticeably different from what it is at the end of the day, once the incisions have tightened again. This variability persists for decades after the keratotomy and cannot be removed surgically.

For the implant calculation, this means keratometry varies depending on the time of measurement: biometry performed in the morning may give a different result from one taken in the afternoon. Repeated measurements and a complete corneal tomography are essential.

02

Irregular astigmatism and high optical aberrations

The radial incisions create surface irregularities that generate higher-order aberrations (HOAs): coma, spherical aberration, trefoil. These aberrations cannot be corrected by a simple sphero-cylindrical correction (glasses or a standard implant) and degrade vision quality, particularly at night.

A complete corneal tomography (Pentacam or equivalent) is required to map these irregularities, quantify the aberrations and guide the choice of implant.

Two options to consider

EDOF

Reducing diurnal variation

In patients with significant diurnal variation, the EDOF implant may be offered not to improve intermediate vision — the usual advantage of this family — but for a reason more specific to radial keratotomy:

Its extended range of focus acts as a refractive buffer. When the corneal curvature fluctuates over the day and slightly shifts the focal point, the EDOF “absorbs” part of these fluctuations — where a monofocal would be more sensitive to each variation in keratometry.

The goal is to improve day-to-day visual stability, not to eliminate the variability (which remains linked to the corneal scars).

IC-8

Reducing the impact of high HOAs

The IC-8 implant (AcuFocus) incorporates a central opaque ring with a 1.36 mm pinhole. Like a photographic aperture, this pinhole narrows the incoming light beam, which increases depth of focus and greatly reduces the impact of irregular optical aberrations on the perceived image quality.

For patients with radial keratotomy and very high HOAs and severe irregular astigmatism, the IC-8 can offer an improvement in vision quality that conventional implants cannot achieve.

The IC-8 reduces the overall brightness reaching the retina. It is contraindicated in cases of macular disease or any optic-nerve condition limiting sensitivity.

Biometric calculation — a point of attention

The standard biometric formulas fail on two counts after radial keratotomy: they account neither for the corneal irregularities nor for the variability of the measurements. The calculation must be performed with adapted formulas, measurements repeated at different times of day, and a complete tomographic analysis. The residual margin of uncertainty is wider than in standard cataract surgery — the patient must be informed of this.

Your assessment determines
the right implant

Biometry, corneal topography, refractive history, visual expectations: the choice of implant is a decision built during the preoperative consultation, not before.

Have you already had laser surgery or radial keratotomy? Your case is covered here →

Already treated — second opinion